Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33733
Title: Potential of MicroalgalBiomass Production in CoastalDeserts for Carbon Dioxide Removal
Authors: Leonard, William
McClure, Dale D
Ng, Kok Siew
Yang, Aidong
Keywords: carbon dioxide removal;microalgal cultivation;direct air capture;biomass burial;biomass energy with carbon capture and storage;air–water CO2 mass transfer;technoeconomic assessment;Environmental Sciences;Oxides;Inorganic carbon compounds;Biomass Mass transfer;Organisms
Issue Date: 12-Aug-2026
Publisher: American Chemical Society (ACS)
Citation: Leonard, W. et al. 'Potential of MicroalgalBiomass Production in CoastalDeserts for Carbon Dioxide Removal', Environmental Science &Technology, 00(0), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6c08729.
Abstract: High photosynthetic yields and the ability to grow without fresh water make microalgae interesting mechanisms for carbon dioxide removal (CDR). We characterize two CDR systems which grow microalgae in seawater in coastal deserts─microalgal bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and microalgal biomass burial─and evaluate their potential when using carbon sourced from the atmosphere or ocean to meet CDR objectives via a comparison with direct air carbon capture and storage (DACCS). By deriving and validating a theoretical model of chemically enhanced carbon dioxide mass transfer, we identify the importance of gas–liquid mass transfer into raceway ponds as limiting microalgal productivities and determining technoeconomic viability. Our analysis shows that, while microalgal CDR cannot compete with DACCS in the areal productivity of removals, net removal costs with marine carbon supply are only slightly higher than DACCS with prospects for parity. Though such outcomes may not yet support the use of microalgal biomass for CDR, the carbon supply apparatuses outlined and the theoretical models accompanying them can inform ongoing research into microalgal cultivation without carbon addition for diverse applications.
Description: Data Availability: Data and code supporting the findings of this work are available upon request from the corresponding author.
Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6c08729. Supplementary methods comprising CDR configurations (Sections S1-S3), albedo (Section S4; Fig S1), carbon and light limited growth (Section S5), water supply pipelines (Section S6), techno-economic equations (Section S7), nominal analysis parameters (Section S8; Tables S1-S3), sensitivity and uncertainty analysis (Sections S9, S10; Table S4), PV-mBB and PV-DACCS optimisation (Section S11), mass transfer modelling (Sections S12-S14; Table S5), and pH measurements (Section S15; Fig S2); Supplementary results comprising mass transfer (Sections S16, S17, S24; Figs S3, S9), burial site capacity (Section S18), comparison of alternative designs (Sections S19, S20; Fig S4), productivity, costs and comparison with literature (Sections S21-S23), and mass transfer enhancement options (Sections S25-S29); Supplementary discussion concerning biomass harvesting, nutrient supply and land use (Sections S30-S32; Fig S5-S8), mBECCS-sale and long-term mCDR perspectives (Section S33; Fig S10), contextualization of the optimistic scenario and limitations (Sections S34, S35) (PDF: https://ndownloader.figstatic.com/files/67474268).
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33733
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c08729
ISSN: 0013-936X
Appears in Collections:Department of Chemical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2026 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).5.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.