Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33936Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Malik, Sarita | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Peck, Mika | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-10-03T15:48:03Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-10-03T15:48:03Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-09-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Malik, S. and Peck, M. (2026) 'A Sociological Approach to the Rights and Dignity of Nature: Towards a Shared Rights Framework', Sociological Research Online: an electronic journal, 0(ahead of print), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1177/13607804261479873. | en_GB |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/33936 | - |
| dc.description | Data availability statement: This study did not generate or analyse any datasets, as it is based entirely on conceptual and theoretical reasoning. | en_GB |
| dc.description.abstract | This article offers a sociological analysis of the global Rights of Nature movement, positioning dignity, repair, and socio-ecological justice at its heart. While Rights of Nature has gained traction across environmental law, Indigenous politics, and ecological science, Sociology has largely overlooked its implications, despite the deeply social origins and unequal consequences of ecological harm. To address this, the article integrates Cultural Sociology with decolonial scholarship and Indigenous relational philosophies, situating Lauren Berlant’s concepts of slow death and cruel optimism alongside the Andean philosophy of Buen Vivir . It reframes ecological degradation as an ongoing violation of dignity affecting both human communities and ecosystems. Recognising nature as a rights-bearing subject challenges foundational assumptions about the human-nature binary in rights discourse, presenting an opportunity to broaden sociological research, society–environment knowledge, and socio-political activism. The article makes three core contributions: first, it establishes the Rights of Nature as a necessary object of sociological analysis, showing that existing anthropocentric frameworks are insufficient for understanding contemporary ecological crisis; second, it demonstrates that sociological concepts, particularly those concerning representation, inequality, coloniality, and governance, provide essential tools for analysing and strengthening Rights of Nature frameworks; and third, it develops an original socio-(eco)logical rights framework grounded in dignity and reparations, including a socio-ecological forensics toolkit that enables the diagnosis of harm and the articulation of reparative pathways across human and more-than-human worlds. Together, these contributions reposition Sociology as central to understanding and advancing socio-ecological justice in the context of the global ecological crisis. | en_GB |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. | en_GB |
| dc.format.extent | pp. 1–18 | - |
| dc.format.medium | Electronic | - |
| dc.language | English | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
| dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_GB |
| dc.rights | Re-use licence for this version: CC BY-NC | - |
| dc.rights | Licence for published version: CC BY-NC | - |
| dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | - |
| dc.subject | rights of nature | en_GB |
| dc.subject | dignity | en_GB |
| dc.subject | reparations | en_GB |
| dc.subject | more-than-human | en_GB |
| dc.subject | cultural sociology | en_GB |
| dc.subject | socio-ecological justice | en_GB |
| dc.subject.other | 1608 Sociology | - |
| dc.subject.other | Sociology | - |
| dc.title | A Sociological Approach to the Rights and Dignity of Nature: Towards a Shared Rights Framework | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | en_GB |
| dc.date.dateAccepted | 2026-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804261479873 | - |
| dc.relation.isPartOf | Sociological Research Online | en_GB |
| pubs.issue | 0 | - |
| pubs.publication-status | Published online | - |
| pubs.volume | 00 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1360-7804 | - |
| dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en | - |
| dcterms.dateAccepted | 2026-08-05 | - |
| dcterms.issued | 2026-09-09 | - |
| dc.date.updated | 2026-10-03T15:42:09Z | - |
| dc.rights.holder | The Author(s) | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Malik, Sarita [0000-0002-0985-5246] | - |
| dc.contributor.orcid | Peck, Mika [0000-0003-0461-0001] | - |
| dc.identifier.number | 13607804261479873 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Department of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers * | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2026. Rights and permissions: Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC 4.0) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). | 546.41 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License