Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPollitt, A-
dc.contributor.authorWooding, S-
dc.contributor.authorHanney, S-
dc.contributor.authorBuxton, MJ-
dc.contributor.authorGrant, J-
dc.identifier.citationRAND Corporation: WR-836, 672pp. 2011en_US
dc.descriptionCopyright @ 2011 RAND Europe. All rights reserved. The full text article is available via the link below.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis project explores the impacts arising from cardiovascular and stroke research funded 15-20 years ago and attempts to draw out aspects of the research, researcher or environment that are associated with high or low impact. The project is a case study-based review of 29 cardiovascular and stroke research grants, funded in Australia, Canada and UK between 1989 and 1993. The case studies focused on the individual grants but considered the development of the investigators and ideas involved in the research projects from initiation to the present day. Grants were selected through a stratified random selection approach that aimed to include both high- and low-impact grants. The key messages are as follows: 1) The cases reveal that a large and diverse range of impacts arose from the 29 grants studied. 2) There are variations between the impacts derived from basic biomedical and clinical research. 3) There is no correlation between knowledge production and wider impacts 4) The majority of economic impacts identified come from a minority of projects. 5) We identified factors that appear to be associated with high and low impact. This report presents the key observations of the study and an overview of the methods involved. It has been written for funders of biomedical and health research and health services, health researchers, and policy makers in those fields. It will also be of interest to those involved in research and impact evaluation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was initiated with internal funding from RAND Europe and HERG, with continuing funding from the UK National Institute for Health Research, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the National Heart Foundation of Australia. The UK Stroke Association and the British Heart Foundation provided support in kind through access to their archives.en_US
dc.publisherRAND Europeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Health Economics Research Group-
dc.subjectProject Retrosighten_US
dc.subjectRAND Europeen_US
dc.subjectPayback Frameworken_US
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease (CVD)en_US
dc.titleProject Retrosight. Understanding the returns from cardiovascular and stroke research: Case Studiesen_US
Appears in Collections:Health Economics Research Group (HERG)

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.