Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaporale, GM-
dc.contributor.authorHanck, C-
dc.coverage.spatial20en
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-06T15:03:13Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-06T15:03:13Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Discussion Paper, Brunel University, 06-18en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1008-
dc.description.abstractWe analyse whether tests of PPP exhibit erratic behaviour (as previously reported by Caporale et al., 2003) even when (possibly unwarranted) homogeneity and proportionality restrictions are not imposed, and trivariate cointegration (stage-three) tests between the nominal exchange rate, domestic and foreign price levels are carried out (instead of stationarity tests on the real exchange rate, as in stage-two tests). We examine the US dollar real exchange rate vis-à-vis 21 other currencies over a period of more than a century, and find that stage-three tests produce similar results to those for stage-two tests, namely the former also behave erratically. This confirms that neither of these traditional approaches to testing for PPP can solve the issue of PPP.en
dc.format.extent535013 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen
dc.subjectPurchasing Power Parity (PPP), Real Exchange Rate, Cointegration,en
dc.subjectStationarity, Parameter Instabilityen
dc.titleCointegration tests of PPP: Do they also exhibit erratic behaviour?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0618.pdf522.47 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.