Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1023
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaporale, GM-
dc.contributor.authorHanck, C-
dc.coverage.spatial10en
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-06T15:11:58Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-06T15:11:58Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Finance Discussion Paper, Brunel University, 06-22en
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1023-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful) are used, any evidence of erratic behaviour disappears, and strong empirical support is found for PPP. It appears therefore that recent advances in panel data econometrics might enable us to settle the PPP debate.en
dc.format.extent158554 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherBrunel Universityen
dc.subjectPurchasing Power Parity (PPP), Real Exchange Rates, Erratic Behaviour, Panelen
dc.subjectTestsen
dc.titleAre PPP tests erratically behaved? Some panel evidenceen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance
Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
0622.pdf154.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.