Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10798
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDale, G-
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, X-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-11T09:34:50Z-
dc.date.available2011-01-
dc.date.available2015-05-11T09:34:50Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Socialism, 2011, 129 pp. 201 - 208en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-8736-
dc.identifier.issn1754-4653-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10798-
dc.description.abstractIn fact, our citation from Day concerned a different question: why sex work attracts stigma. We claimed that sex work threatens only a “particular moral economy” within capitalism. Fox, a self-employed sex worker who runs an escort agency, is no longer an IUSW member. The IUSW does not only include wage labourers and the self-employed in its ranks, yet these are the majority. We regard it as we do any union: critically. Other unions engage in disreputable activity (sweetheart deals, graft, etc), and many include managers, but they remain unions. We repudiate Edwards’s suggestion that we deny that prostitution can be harmful. It is an outlandish claim. What we say is that the degree of harm varies greatly according to individuals and circumstances.en_US
dc.format.extent201 - 208-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Socialismen_US
dc.subjectSex Worken_US
dc.subjectCapitalismen_US
dc.titleSex work: A rejoinderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Socialism-
pubs.volume129-
pubs.volume129-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Notice.pdf38.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.