Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10833
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Riefa, C | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-12T10:12:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-12 | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-12T10:12:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | University of Western Australia Law Review, 37(1): 1 - 19, (2013) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0042-0328 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2603683 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10833 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper studies the terms of 28 online auction sites. It uncovers that, in this industry, unfair terms are common. The paper focusses on a small number of clauses but conclusively shows that enforcement in the UK is insufficient. The reasons for this insufficiency are explored and solutions proposed. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1 - 19 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Social Science Electronic Publishing | en_US |
dc.subject | Unfair terms | en_US |
dc.subject | Online auction | en_US |
dc.subject | Contract terms | en_US |
dc.subject | Enforcement | en_US |
dc.subject | UK | en_US |
dc.title | An empirical study of unfair terms in online auction contracts in the UK: Evidence for the need for better enforcement mechanisms | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | University of Western Australia Law Review | - |
pubs.issue | 1 | - |
pubs.issue | 1 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.volume | 37 | - |
pubs.volume | 37 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fulltext.pdf | 247.09 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.