Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, KJ-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T15:35:53Z-
dc.date.available2016-
dc.date.available2016-02-04T15:35:53Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Historical Studies, 2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn1940-5049-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12022-
dc.description.abstractThis article takes issue with a recent argument, made by the late Rupert Gerritsen, that Matthew Flinders deliberately concocted a myth about a north-south strait dividing Australia in order to gain the attention and patronage of Sir Joseph Banks to support the first circumnavigation of Terra Australis in HMS Investigator in 1801-3. The paper argues that Flinders did not create a myth but based his arguments on contemporary views that such a dividing strait might exist, backed up with cartographic evidence. Flinders’ achievements in connection with the circumnavigation, it is further argued, reflected the analytical mind that led him to search for a straiten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.titleAn Historical Myth? Matthew Flinders and the Quest for a Straiten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/1031461X.2016.1250791-
dc.relation.isPartOfAustralian Historical Studies-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf398.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.