Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12359
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBroadhurst, S-
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-16T13:42:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-
dc.date.available2016-03-16T13:42:42Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Drama Studies, 65, pp. 212 - 236, (2014)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0810-4123-
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=806798838649006;res=IELHSS-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/12359-
dc.description.abstractIn this article, it is my intention to examine and compare aesthetic and neuroaesthetic theorisation in order to provide interpretive strategies that would be capable of addressing sophisticated technological art practices. In doing so, I will provide a study of two mutually enhancing approaches to this analysis - namely, the writings and aesthetic theorisation of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and a neuroaesthetic approach linking performance and art practices to neuroscientific research in order to provide some understanding of the biolog ical underpinnings of aesthetic experience. It is my belief that these diverse approaches have much to contribute to interpreting such developments. Due to the vast amount of research undertaken in this area, visual perception is central (though not exclusive) to a biologically related approach. The general direction of such research illuminates the problem as summarised by Francis Crick: 'It is difficult for many people to accept that what they see is a symbolic interpretation of the world - it all seems so much like "the real thing"'.en_US
dc.format.extent212 - 236-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Queensland, Department of Englishen_US
dc.subjectPerformance and technologyen_US
dc.subjectArt and perceptionen_US
dc.subjectAesthetic theorizationen_US
dc.subjectDefamiliarizationen_US
dc.subjectMerleau-Pontyen_US
dc.subjectExtended bodyen_US
dc.subject'Visible’ and ‘invisible’en_US
dc.subjectEmbodied experienceen_US
dc.subjectNeuroaesthetic approachen_US
dc.subjectVisual perceptionen_US
dc.titleTheorising performance and technology: Aesthetic and neuroaesthetic approachesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfAustralasian Drama Studies-
pubs.volume65-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Arts and Humanities Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf895.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.