Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1376
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKholeif, A-
dc.contributor.authorAbdel-Kader, MG-
dc.contributor.authorSherer, M-
dc.coverage.spatial21en
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-04T10:25:43Z-
dc.date.available2007-12-04T10:25:43Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 3(3): 250-299en
dc.identifier.issn1832-5912-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1376-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This paper examines a detailed case study of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) customization failure in an Egyptian state-owned company (AML) by drawing on new institutional sociology and its extensions. It explains how ERP customization failure is shaped by the interplay between institutionalised accounting practices, conflicting institutions, power relations and market forces. Methodology/Approach: The research methodology is based on using an intensive case study informed by new institutional sociology, especially the interplay between conflicting institutions, power relations and market forces. Data were collected from multiple sources, including interviews, observations, discussions and documentary analysis. Findings: The findings revealed that the inability of the ERP system to meet the core accounting requirements of the control authorities (the Central Agency for Accountability) was the explicit reason cited for the ERP failure. The externally imposed requirements of the Uniform Accounting System and planning budgets were used to resist both other institutional pressures (from the Holding Company for Engineering Industries) and market and competitive pressures. Research limitations: There are some limitations associated with the use of the case study method, including the inability to generalize from the findings of a single case study, some selectivity in the individuals interviewed, and the subjective interpretation by the researchers of the empirical data. Practical implications: The paper identifies that the interplay between institutional pressures, institutionalised accounting practices, intra-organizational power relations, and market forces contributed to the failure to embed ERP in a major company. Understanding such relationships can help other organisations to become more aware of the factors affecting successful implementation of new ERP systems and provide a better basis for planning the introduction of new technologies. Originality/value of paper: This paper draws on recent research and thinking in sociology, especially the development and application of new institutional sociology. In addition, the paper is concerned with ERP implementation and use and management accounting in a transitional economy, Egypt, and hence contributes to debate about exporting Western accounting practices and other technologies to countries with different cultures and different stages of economic and political development. Classification: Research paper/ case studyen
dc.format.extent244548 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherEmeralden
dc.subjectEnterprise resource planningen
dc.subjectInstitutionalised accounting practicesen
dc.subjectEgypten
dc.subjectNew institutional sociologyen
dc.subjectCase studyen
dc.titleERP customization failure: Institutionalized accounting practices, power relations and market forcesen
dc.typeResearch Paperen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/18325910710820292-
Appears in Collections:Business and Management
Economics and Finance
Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JOAOC 2007.pdf238.82 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.