Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Comparison on intracochlear disturbances between drilling a manual and robotic cochleostomy
Authors: Assadi, MZ
Du, X
Dalton, J
Henshaw, S
Coulson, CJ
Reid, AP
Proops, DW
Brett, PN
Keywords: Robotic micro-drill;Cochleostomy;Microscope scanning vibrometer;Vibration
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Citation: Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 227(9): pp. 1002 - 1008, (2013)
Abstract: In hearing preservation cochlear implantation (HPCI), it is considered that minimizing disturbances in hearing organ are likely to reduce trauma and protection of the underlying endosteal membrane of the cochlea is an important factor in cochleostomy formation. The robotic micro-drill system tested in this paper is the first example of an autonomous surgical drill successfully producing a cochleostomy, which keeps the underlying endosteal membrane intact. This study compares induced vibrations within the cochlea during formation of the cochleostomy between using the robotic micro-drill and conventional manual drilling. The vibration of the endosteal membrane is measured using a Microscope Scanning Vibrometer (MSV) at a third window, produced in the cochlea. Results show that the highest velocity amplitude measured was associated with the manual drilling. The robotic micro-drill produced only about 1% of the peak velocity amplitude seen in manual drilling and exhibited much more uniform behaviour, while keeping the underlying membrane intact. The technique applied when using the robotic drill could be a major step in reducing the trauma to the cochlea, by reducing disturbance levels.
ISSN: 0954-4119
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical Aerospace and Civil Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.docx740.5 kBUnknownView/Open

Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.