Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14715
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRai, A-
dc.contributor.authorTassou, SA-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-08T13:16:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-01-
dc.date.available2017-06-08T13:16:50Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationEnergy Conversion and Management, (2017)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/14715-
dc.description.abstractCryogenic transport refrigeration systems using Liquid Carbon Dioxide or Liquid Nitrogen are proposed as good alternatives to current vapour compression transport refrigeration units powered by auxiliary diesel engines due to their potential for lower environmental impacts and rapid cooling capability. This paper analyses the greenhouse gas emissions of cryogenic and diesel driven vapour compression refrigeration systems for two different temperature controlled lorry sizes and a number of chilled and frozen food products. Both the production and operation emissions have been considered. The results showed that the production emissions of diesel and refrigerant in the vapour compression system can be up to 66% lower than the production emissions of cryogens. However, when taking total emissions into consideration, emissions from all three transport refrigeration technologies are fairly similar and within the margin of error of the assumptions made. The major disadvantage of cryogenic systems is their much higher mass intensity (20 to 60. kg/h), defined as the mass of liquid cryogen per mass of product transported per km, which is almost 10 times higher than that of diesel (2.0-4.0 l/h). This limits their food distribution range per cryogenic fluid tank and together with lack of refilling infrastructure present a barrier to the wider adoption of cryogenic systems for temperature controlled food distribution.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work presented in this paper received funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through grant No: EP/K011820/1 and the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), project Number FO405. The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Research Councils’ UK Energy Programme and DEFRA. All data used in the study and results are provided in full in the results section of this paper.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectTransport refrigeration unit (TRU)en_US
dc.subjectTransport refrigeration (TR)en_US
dc.subjectTemperature-controlled distributionen_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse Gas (GHG) emissionsen_US
dc.subjectLiquid carbon dioxideen_US
dc.subjectLiquid nitrogenen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental impacts of vapour compression and cryogenic transport refrigeration technologies for temperature controlled food distributionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.024-
dc.relation.isPartOfEnergy Conversion and Management-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fulltext.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.