Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1624
Title: Sorting the wheat from the chaff: A study on the detection of alarms
Authors: Stanton, NA
Harrison, DJ
Taylor-Burge, KL
Porter, LJ
Keywords: Alarms;Alarm reduction;False alarms;Signal detection
Issue Date: 2000
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Cognition, Technology and Work. 2(3): 134-141
Abstract: The research in this paper considers the evidence on the success of alarm reduction strategies reported in the open literature. Despite strong beliefs to the contrary, the empirical evidence suggest that alarm reduction strategies have not been as successful as initially expected. This seems to be due to the fact that alarm reduction strategies actually deprive process control operators of information. In order to determine the ability of people to sift through alarm information, a study of alarm detection with three ratios of target to non-target alarms was devised (i.e. 2%, 6% and 10%) and the information was presented at three rates (i.e. 1 second, 4 seconds and 8 seconds). The results show that the ratio of target alarms has no effect on detection performance, but the temporal rate does. Given that process operators are rarely required to acknowledge alarm information in real time, it is suggested that more emphasis should be placed on initial definition of alarms and better presentation methods, rather than attempts to block the flow of alarms that have already been triggered.
URI: www.springerlink.com
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/1624
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220052399131
Appears in Collections:Design
Ergonomics
Dept of Design Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sorting_the_Wheat_from_the_Chaff_Stanton_et_al.pdf116.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.