Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17488
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDe Pascalis, F-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-13T16:20:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-30-
dc.date.available2019-02-13T16:20:25Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Business Law Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6941-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17488-
dc.description.abstractFollowing serious and widespread episodes of misconduct in the financial services industry, regulators, international standard-setting bodies and financial institutions worldwide have been discussing opportune approaches to deal with conduct risk. Identifying, analysing and tackling this risk have become the keywords to make financial firms take proactive steps against a common problem. Significantly, the way misconduct risk is understood will determine the ways for dealing with it properly. Given the incentives and guidelines that regulators and policymakers have so far provided within the conduct risk debate, it is natural to review their own review of such a risk. In practice, this paper addresses the question of whether their interpretation constitutes a solid, clear and consistent basis for financial institution proper understanding and management.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Law Internationalen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectLossen_US
dc.subjectMisconducten_US
dc.subjectConduct risken_US
dc.subjectConsumer protectionen_US
dc.subjectMarket integrityen_US
dc.titleConduct Risk: Meaning, Interpretation and Dissensionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean Business Law Review-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusAccepted-
pubs.volume30-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf694.18 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.