Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17768
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKartsaklas, A-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T15:45:47Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-24-
dc.date.available2019-03-21T15:45:47Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationBulletin of Economic Researchen_US
dc.identifier.issn0307-3378-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/17768-
dc.description.abstractWe investigate whether the trading activity generated by investors with different access to information and trading motives has positive or negative impact on index futures volatility. Surprises in non‐member institutional, individual and foreign investors' trading volume are positively associated with volatility in most of the cases. For member institutional investors, unexpected trading volume is positively related to volatility. Long‐run changes in the trading activity also affect volatility differently across trader types. Finally, allowing for time‐to‐maturity effects, surprises in open interest are associated with more volatility towards contract expiration, contrary to the negative effect we find during normal times.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrunel University Londonen_US
dc.subjectFinancial crisisen_US
dc.subjectfutures marketsen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional investorsen_US
dc.subjectRange based volatilityen_US
dc.subjectTrading volumeen_US
dc.titleTRADER TYPE EFFECTS ON THE VOLATILITY‐VOLUME RELATIONSHIP. EVIDENCE FROM THE KOSPI 200 INDEX FUTURES MARKET.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/boer.12138-
dc.relation.isPartOfBulletin of Economic Research-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf175.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.