Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18426
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Alexandris Polomarkakis, K | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-13T10:51:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-06 | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-13T10:51:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Alexandris Polomarkakis, K. (2017) 'A tale of two approaches to Social Europe: The CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis', Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (3), pp. 424 - 437. doi: 10.1177/1023263X17722337. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1023-263X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18426 | - |
dc.format.extent | 424 - 437 | - |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | en_US |
dc.title | A tale of two approaches to Social Europe: The CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17722337 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law | - |
pubs.issue | 3 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.volume | 24 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2399-5548 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | 236.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.