Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18426
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlexandris Polomarkakis, K-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-13T10:51:40Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-
dc.date.available2019-06-13T10:51:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationAlexandris Polomarkakis, K. (2017) 'A tale of two approaches to Social Europe: The CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis', Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (3), pp. 424 - 437. doi: 10.1177/1023263X17722337.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1023-263X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/18426-
dc.format.extent424 - 437-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.titleA tale of two approaches to Social Europe: The CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X17722337-
dc.relation.isPartOfMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume24-
dc.identifier.eissn2399-5548-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf236.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.