Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/19768
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSavani, MM-
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T11:14:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-28-
dc.date.available2019-12-06T11:14:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-28-
dc.identifier.citationSavani, M.M. (2019) 'Can commitment contracts boost participation in public health programmes?', Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 82, 101457, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2019.101457.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-8043-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/19768-
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Author. Commitment devices aim to help people make better choices in the face of their inherent biases: they are voluntary strategies aimed at changing behaviours by introducing costs to your current self, to bring about gains for your future self. Adherence to a structured health intervention is an important part of achieving health goals, and may be improved by commitment devices designed to keep people on track with their health goals. A field experiment set in a public weight management programme tests whether a personal commitment device in the form of a contract with oneself, which relies solely on self-reputation costs, can raise weekly participation and completion of the programme. Results suggest the commitment contract can significantly improve attendance (p = 0.05) and completion rates (p = 0.032), with some suggestive evidence that the contract works especially well for people with more myopic health attitudes. Findings also suggest the commitment contract can substitute for, but does not necessarily add to, wider commitment features in the health programme; raising new questions around threshold effects and the theory underlying commitment devices.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 12 (12)-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectcommitment deviceen_US
dc.subjecthealth behaviouren_US
dc.subjectfield experimenten_US
dc.subjectbehavioural public policyen_US
dc.subjectdual-self theoryen_US
dc.titleCan commitment contracts boost participation in public health programmes?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101457-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics-
pubs.issueOctober 2019-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume82-
dc.identifier.eissn2214-8051-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf933.57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons