Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Cost-effectiveness of two long-lasting insecticidal nets delivery models in mass campaign in rural Mozambique|
|Keywords:||Long-lasting insecticidal nets campaign;Universal health coverage;New and standard delivery model,;Cost-effectiveness analysis;Malaria|
|Citation:||BMC Research Notes, 2019, 12 (1)|
|Abstract:||© 2019 The Author(s). Objective: The aim is to compare the cost-effectiveness of two long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) delivery models (standard vs. new) in universal coverage (UC) campaigns in rural Mozambique. Results: The total financial cost of delivering LLINs was US 231,237.30 and US 174,790.14 in the intervention (302,648 LLINs were delivered) and control districts (219,613 LLINs were delivered), respectively. The average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) per LLIN delivered and ACER per household (HH) achieving UC was lower in the intervention districts. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per LLIN and ICER per HH reaching UC were US 0.68 and US 2.24, respectively. Both incremental net benefit (for delivered LLIN and for HHs reaching UC) were positive (intervention deemed cost-effective). Overall, the newer delivery model was the more cost-effective intervention. However, the long-term sustainability of either delivery models is far from guaranteed in Mozambique's current economic context.|
|Appears in Collections:||Dept of Mechanical Aerospace and Civil Engineering Research Papers|
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.