Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20065
Title: Conservation and the social sciences: Beyond critique and co‐optation. A case study from orangutan conservation
Authors: Chua, L
Harrison, ME
Fair, H
Milne, S
Palmer, A
Rubis, J
Thung, P
Wich, S
Büscher, B
Cheyne, SM
Puri, RK
Schreer, V
Stępień, A
Meijaard, E
Keywords: Borneo;conservation–social science relationship;orangutan conservation;Sumatra
Issue Date: 20-Jan-2020
Publisher: Wiley on behalf of British Ecological Society
Citation: Chua, L. et al. (2020) 'Conservation and the social sciences: Beyond critique and co‐optation. A case study from orangutan conservation', People and Nature, 2 (1), pp. 42 - 60. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10072.
Abstract: 1. Interactions between conservation and the social sciences are frequently characterized by either critique (of conservation by social scientists) or co-optation (of social scientific methods and insights by conservationists). 2. This article seeks to push beyond these two dominant positions by exploring how conservationists and social scientists can engage in mutually transformative dialogue. Jointly authored by conservation scientists and social scientists, it uses the global nexus of orangutan conservation as a lens onto current challenges and possibilities facing the conservation–social science relationship. 3. We begin with a cross-disciplinary overview of recent developments in orangutan conservation—particularly those concerned with its social, political and other human dimensions. 4. The article then undertakes a synthetic analysis of key challenges in orangutan conservation—working across difference, juggling scales and contexts and dealing with politics and political economy—and links them to analogous concerns in the conservation–social science relationship. 5. Finally, we identify some ways by which orangutan conservation specifically, and the conservation–social science relationship more generally, can move forward: through careful use of proxies as bridging devices, through the creation of new, shared spaces, and through a willingness to destabilize and overhaul status quos. This demands an open-ended, unavoidably political commitment to critical reflexivity and self-transformation on the part of both conservationists and social scientists.
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20065
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10072
Other Identifiers: pan3.10072 ORCiD: Liana Chua https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7518-8181
ORCiD: Mark E. Harrison https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-8407 
ORCiD: Hannah Fair https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-778X
ORCiD: Sol Milne https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3005-9631
ORCiD: Alexandra Palmer https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-4813
ORCiD: June Rubis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5734-0469
ORCiD: Serge Wich https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3954-5174
ORCiD: Susan M. Cheyne https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9180-3356
ORCiD: Viola Schreer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-7819
ORCiD: Erik Meijaard https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8685-3685
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2020 The Authors. People and Nature published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.1.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons