Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20475
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSteeley, JM-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-11T10:58:50Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-01-
dc.date.available2020-03-11T10:58:50Z-
dc.date.issued2015-03-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International Money and Finance, 2015, 51 pp. 303 - 336en_US
dc.identifier.issn0261-5606-
dc.identifier.issnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.11.007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/20475-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. We examine the returns to UK government bonds before, during and between the phases of quantitative easing to identify the side effects for the market itself. We show that the onset of QE led to a sustained reduction in the costs of trading and removed some return regularities. However, controlling for a wide range of market activity, including issuance and QE announcements, we find evidence that investors could have earned excess returns after costs by trading in response to the purchase auction calendar. Drawing on economic theory, we explore the implications of these findings for both the efficiency of the market and the costs of government debt management in both the short and long run.en_US
dc.format.extent303 - 336-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative easingen_US
dc.subjectGiltsen_US
dc.subjectUK bondsen_US
dc.subjectPrice efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectBond investorsen_US
dc.titleThe side effects of quantitative easing: Evidence from the UK bond marketen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.11.007-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of International Money and Finance-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume51-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf680.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.