Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22946
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAstin, D-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-16T10:59:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-16T10:59:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationAstin, D. (2020) 'Housing disputes as relationship breakdown: a useful model or an accommodation with a broken system?', Civil Justice Quarterly, 39 (4), pp. 340-360. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB59948E0037911EBA538808A19323CA7/View/FullText.htmlen_US
dc.identifier.issn0261-9261-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/22946-
dc.description.abstractEvaluates proposals by the JUSTICE Working Group for a Housing Dispute Service (HDS), and assesses whether they are based on an inaccurate characterisation of such disputes. Reviews its approach to the causes of the current problems, key features of the HDS procedure, and its application of the relationship breakdown model. Considers whether its proposed model for investigations is unattractive, and is an accommodation with a broken system.-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwell (Thomson Reuters)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Sweet and Maxwell. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Civil Justice Quarterly following peer review, made available under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC) Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). The definitive published version [insert complete citation information here] is available online on Westlaw UK. Available at https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB59948E0037911EBA538808A19323CA7/View/FullText.html (see: https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/terms/journals-access-policy.htm).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectaccess to justiceen_US
dc.subjectdispute resolutionen_US
dc.subjecthomelessnessen_US
dc.subjecthousingen_US
dc.titleHousing disputes as relationship breakdown: a useful model or an accommodation with a broken system?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isPartOfCivil Justice Quarterly-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume39-
dc.identifier.eissn2754-155X-
dc.rights.holderSweet and Maxwell-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2020 Sweet and Maxwell. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Civil Justice Quarterly following peer review, made available under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC) Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). The definitive published version [insert complete citation information here] is available online on Westlaw UK. Available at https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB59948E0037911EBA538808A19323CA7/View/FullText.html (see: https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/terms/journals-access-policy.htm).446.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons