Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPazzona, M-
dc.contributor.authorSpagnolo, N-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-12T07:35:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-12T07:35:58Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-30-
dc.identifierORCiD: Matteo Pazzona https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3245-6726-
dc.identifierORCiD: Nicola Spagnolo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-2104-
dc.identifier56-
dc.identifier.citationPazzona, M. and Spagnolo, N. (2024) 'Do not shut up and do dribble: social media and TV consumption', Journal of Population Economics, 37, 56, pp. 1 - 25. doi: 10.1007/s00148-024-01034-7.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0933-1433-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/23729-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the impact of social media interest and sentiment surrounding the 2020 National Basketball Association’s involvement with the Black Lives Matter movement on the television audience in the United States. Twitter (now known as X) serves as the chosen social media platform, and we determine the sentiment expressed in tweets (messages posted on Twitter) using the XLM-RoBERTa deep language model. Our primary findings indicate that the quantity of users’ posts does not significantly influence TV viewership; instead, the tone of the messages plays a crucial role. Positive messages supporting the NBA’s engagement correlate with an increase in the number of viewers, while those expressing opposition do not. We argue that this asymmetry may stem from a positive elasticity among casual (non-habitual) NBA viewers concerning positive sentiments toward NBA involvement. These viewers are likely to align with the NBA’s stances on civil rights and BLM. In contrast, the core NBA fan base exhibits inelastic demand and is unlikely to cease watching NBA games. A comprehensive set of robustness checks reinforces the validity of our key conclusions.-
dc.format.extent1 - 25-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.subjectblack lives matteren_US
dc.subjectsentimenten_US
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectTV consumption-
dc.titleDo not shut up and do dribble: social media and TV consumptionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-05-17-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-024-01034-7-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Population Economics-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume37-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1475-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.721.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons