Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24013
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCullen, S-
dc.contributor.authorMackay, R-
dc.contributor.authorMohagheghi, A-
dc.contributor.authorDu, X-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-28T12:19:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-28T12:19:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-16-
dc.identifierORCiD: Sean Cullen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9515-9000-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ruth Mackay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6456-6914-
dc.identifierORCiD: Amir Mohagheghi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-3718-
dc.identifierORCiD: Xinli Du https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2604-0804-
dc.identifier8405-
dc.identifier.citationCullen, S. et al. (2021) ‘The Use of Smartphone Photogrammetry to Digitise Transtibial Sockets: Optimisation of Method and Quantitative Evaluation of Suitability’, Sensors, 21 (24), 8405, pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.3390/s21248405.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/24013-
dc.description.abstractThe fit of a lower limb prosthetic socket is critical for user comfort and the quality of life of lower limb amputees. Sockets are conventionally produced using hand-crafted patient-based casting techniques. Modern digital techniques offer a host of advantages to the process and ultimately lead to improving the lives of amputees. However, commercially available scanning equipment required is often expensive and proprietary. Smartphone photogrammetry could offer a low cost alternative, but there is no widely accepted imaging technique for prosthetic socket digitisation. Therefore, this paper aims to determine an optimal imaging technique for whole socket photogrammetry and evaluate the resultant scan measurement accuracy. A 3D printed transtibial socket was produced to create digital and physical twins, as reference models. The printed socket was photographed from 360 positions and simplified genetic algorithms were used to design a series of experiments, whereby a collection of photos were processed using Autodesk ReCap. The most fit technique was used to assess accuracy. The accuracy of the socket wall volume, surface area and height were 61.63%, 99.61% and 99.90%, respectively, when compared to the digital reference model. The scanned model had a wall thickness ranging from 2.075 mm at the top to 7.758 mm towards the base of the socket, compared to a consistent thickness of 2.025 mm in the control model. The technique selected did not show sufficient accuracy for clinical application due to the degradation of accuracy nearer to the base of the socket interior. However, using an internal wall thickness estimation, scans may be of sufficient accuracy for clinical use; assuming a uniform wall thickness.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by EPSRC, through the studentship funding for S.C.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectlower limb prosthesisen_US
dc.subjectsocketen_US
dc.subjectCAD-CAMen_US
dc.subjectphotogrammetryen_US
dc.subjectgenetic algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectscanningen_US
dc.subjectdigital twinen_US
dc.subjectmeasurement techniquesen_US
dc.titleThe use of smartphone photogrammetry to digitise transtibial sockets: Optimisation of method and quantitative evaluation of suitabilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s21248405-
dc.relation.isPartOfSensors-
pubs.issue24-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume21-
dc.identifier.eissn1424-8220-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.3.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons