Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/2481
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Piper, CD | - |
dc.contributor.author | Miachichev, A | - |
dc.coverage.spatial | 13 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-07-11T09:33:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-11T09:33:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Child and Family Law Quarterly. 15(1) 57-69 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/2481 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the context of the history of the Adoption and Children Act 2002, this article contrasts the approach of English legislation and case-law with the Family Code of the Russian Federation in relation to a child’s right to veto decisions made about his future. Referring to empirical research conducted in Russia, it concludes that there is considerable merit in requiring the child’s consent. | en |
dc.format.extent | 215421 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | Jordan | en |
dc.title | A child’s right to veto in England and Russia – Another welfare ploy? | en |
dc.type | Research Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Law Brunel Law School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Veto [title revised] 2003CFLQ57.pdf | 210.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.