Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25144
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCunha, MPe-
dc.contributor.authorClegg, S-
dc.contributor.authorRego, A-
dc.contributor.authorGiustiniano, L-
dc.contributor.authorAbrantes, ACM-
dc.contributor.authorMiner, AS-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, AV-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T11:18:39Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-19-
dc.date.available2022-09-01T11:18:39Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-19-
dc.identifier.citationCunha, M.P.e., et al. (2022) 'Myopia during emergency improvisation: lessons from a catastrophic wildfire', Management Decision. 60 (7), pp. 2019 - 2041. doi: 10.1108/MD-03-2021-0378.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0025-1747-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25144-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how a number of processes joined to create the micro-level strategies and procedures that resulted in the most lethal and tragic forest fire in Portugal’s history, recalled as the EN236-1 road tragedy in the fire of Pedrógão Grande. Design/methodology/approach – Using an inductive theory development approach, we consider how the urgency and scale of perceived danger coupled with failures of system-wide communication led fire teams to improvise repeatedly. Findings – This study shows how structure collapse led teams to use only local information prompting acts of improvisational myopia, in the particular shape of corrosive myopia, and how a form of incidental improvisation led to catastrophic results. Practical implications – This research offers insights into the dangers of improvisation arising from corrosive myopia, identifying ways to minimize them with the development of improvisation practices that allow for the creation of new patterns of action. The implications for managing surprise through improvisation extend to risk contexts beyond wildfires. Originality/value – This article stands out for showing the impact of improvisational myopia, especially in its corrosive form, which stands in stark contrast to the central role of attention to local context highlighted in previous research on improvisation. At the same time, by exploring the effects of incidental improvisation, it also departs from the agentic conception of improvisation widely discussed in the improvisation literature.en_US
dc.format.extent2019 - 2041-
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0-
dc.subjectImprovisationen_US
dc.subjectImprovisational myopiaen_US
dc.subjectIncidental improvisationen_US
dc.subjectIncidental improvisationen_US
dc.subjectIntuition-rationalityen_US
dc.subjectForest firesen_US
dc.subjectPortugalen_US
dc.titleMyopia during emergency improvisation: lessons from a catastrophic wildfireen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2021-0378-
dc.relation.isPartOfManagement Decision-
pubs.issue7-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume60-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf2.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons