Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25260
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCunha, MPe-
dc.contributor.authorRego, A-
dc.contributor.authorBerti, M-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, AV-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-04T10:54:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-04T10:54:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-16-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Miguel Pina e Cunha https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-2440-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Arménio Rego https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-0511-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Marco Berti https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-8824-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Ace Volkmann Simpson https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-328X-
dc.identifier.citationCunha, M.P.e. et al. (2022) 'Understanding pragmatic paradoxes: When contradictions become paralyzing and what to do about it', Business Horizons, 66 (4), pp. 453 - 462. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2022.09.004.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-6813-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25260-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University and The Authors. Integration of paradoxes, comprising interdependent yet contradictory tensions such as those of stability and change, learning and performing, or the individual and the collective, have been recently recognized as sources of synergy and competitive advantage. When adequately navigated, paradoxes may promote innovation, favoring generative complementarities. Not all paradoxes, however, have such generative effects. Pragmatic paradoxes, or managerially imposed contradictory demands that must be disobeyed to be obeyed, tend create paralyzing catch-22 situations. Like weeds, pragmatic paradoxes may also grow alongside the generative type. We explore the conditions in which pragmatic paradoxes become invasive in organizations, identify their main characteristics and symptoms, discuss their roots, and recommend potential approaches for their eradication.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2019, UIDB/00124/2020, Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016, and UID/GES/00731/2020; UID/GES/00315/2020), POR Lisboa and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, PINFRA/22209/2016).en_US
dc.format.extent453 - 462-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectparadoxesen_US
dc.subjectpragmatismen_US
dc.subjectorganizational conflicten_US
dc.subjectCatch-22en_US
dc.subjectKafkaesqueen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding pragmatic paradoxes: When contradictions become paralyzing and what to do about iten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.09.004-
dc.relation.isPartOfBusiness Horizons-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume66-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6068-
dc.rights.holderKelley School of Business, Indiana University-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. Published by Elsevier Inc. under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons