Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25570
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOzbilgin, MF-
dc.contributor.authorErbil, C-
dc.contributor.authorBaykut, S-
dc.contributor.authorKamasak, R-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-02T10:57:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-02T10:57:17Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-02-
dc.identifierORCID iDs: Mustafa F. Ozbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534; Cihat Erbil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-7016; Sibel Baykut https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-1040; Rifat Kamasak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8768-3569.-
dc.identifier.citationOzbilgin, M.F. et al. (2022) 'Passing as resistance through a Goffmanian approach: Normalized, defensive, strategic, and instrumental passing when LGBTQ+ individuals encounter institutions', Gender, Work and Organization, 0 (in press), pp. 1 - 19. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12928.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0968-6673-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/25570-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Passing and coming out are two divergent individual strategies historically associated with the LGBTQ+ community as they struggle to fit in with normative expectations at work and in life. While coming out has gradually become more common in organizations and national contexts that offer safeguards for LGBTQ+ individuals, passing remains an option where no such measures are available. Drawing on interviews with working-class LGBTQ+ individuals in a country with an adversarial context, that is, Turkey, we identify how varieties of passing, defined as acting and appearing to fit with the dominant sexual orientation and gender identity norms, are used as strategies of coping with institutional norms. Working-class LGBTQ+ individuals are an important group to study as many draw their pride, power, and identity from their engagement with work and the labor market. Transcending the monolithic accounts of passing, we illustrate four variants of passing (i.e., normalized, defensive, strategic, and instrumental passing) that LGBTQ+ individuals deploy at work. Reflecting on the field study findings, we explicate how and why LGBTQ+ individuals choose to pass at work in each case.en_US
dc.format.extent862 - 880 (19)-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Gender, Work & Organization published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectGoffmanen_US
dc.subjectLGBTQ+ individualsen_US
dc.subjectpassingen_US
dc.subjectqualitative studyen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titlePassing as resistance through a Goffmanian approach: Normalized, defensive, strategic, and instrumental passing when LGBTQ+ individuals encounter institutionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12928-
dc.relation.isPartOfGender, Work and Organization-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume30-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0432-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Gender, Work & Organization published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.387.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons