Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26083
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGobio-Thomas, LB-
dc.contributor.authorDarwish, M-
dc.contributor.authorStojceska, V-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T10:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-16-
dc.date.available2023-03-08T10:04:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-16-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Valentina Stojceska https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-2074-
dc.identifier101670-
dc.identifier.citationGobio-Thomas, L.B., Darwish, M. and Stojceska, V. (2023) 'Environmental impacts of solar thermal power plants used in industrial supply chains', Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 38, 101670, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101670.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26083-
dc.descriptionData availability: No data was used for the research described in the article.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). A systematic literature review was conducted to investigate the environmental impact of solar thermal power plants in the industrial supply chains. A number of different solar thermal power collectors like parabolic trough (PT), linear Fresnel (LFR), solar dish (SD) and solar towers (ST) were considered and analysed. The first observation was that PT collectors generate the lowest level of Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, followed by LFR, DT and SD plants. There was a lack of studies dealing with the GHG emissions of LFR and SD plants, which demonstrated a need of conducting more studies to gain better understanding of their environmental performances. The second observation was that different environmental assessment software tools used for analysing the environmental impact showed conflicting results because of the different approaches used in the characterization factors management in each software. Those software tools include: SimaPro, Gabi, System Advisor Model (SAM), Umberto and Thermoflex + PEACE. The standardization of environmental software tools and life cycle impact assessment methods is required to prevent discrepancies in life cycle assessment results. The third observation was the need for integrated environmental and economic assessments to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the solar thermal plants as it will enable investors, policy-makers and researchers to make informed decisions about the environmental and economic impacts of those plants.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, Application of Solar Thermal processes in Industrial Processes (ASTEP), under grant agreement No 884411.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 12-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.languageen-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectlife cycle assessment (LCA)en_US
dc.subjectenvironmental assessmenten_US
dc.subjectsolar thermal plantsen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental impacten_US
dc.subjectsustainability assessmenten_US
dc.subjectCSP plantsen_US
dc.titleEnvironmental impacts of solar thermal power plants used in industrial supply chainsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2023.101670-
dc.relation.isPartOfThermal Science and Engineering Progress-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume38-
dc.identifier.eissn2451-9049-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers
Institute of Energy Futures

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).2.39 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons