Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26510
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Barnes, V | - |
dc.contributor.author | De Pascalis, F | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-24T11:01:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-05-24T11:01:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023-04-17 | - |
dc.identifier | ORCID iD: Francesco De Pascalis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5318-6465 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Barnes, V. and De Pascalis, F. (2023) 'R v Natwest (2021): Another turning point in the regulation of big banks?', The Company Lawyer, 44 (5), pp. 143 - 151. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I34165430D99011ED9A5BA25F1939BE9E/View/FullText.html | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-1027 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/26510 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines R v NatWest, which made headline news for the record fine given to NatWest following allegations of money laundering. This is a first for banking history. The facts themselves are equally remarkable. The analysis conducted in this article proffers some insights into how such activity persisted. Such a discussion shows how unusual the events were in the context of banking history. A contextualized overview of the growth of NatWest has much to offer those interested in the culture and the internal processes within the bank, which lead to a breach of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007. The present case offers numerous points for reflection. Such a comprehensive analysis is worth undertaking not only because of the historical shifts that can be observed in the banking industry though R v NatWest. It shows how some of the tensions in this case are age-old, but, equally, that the decision here has important implications for the future of banking and financial law. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 143 - 151 | - |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sweet and Maxwell | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2023 Sweet and Maxwell. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review, made available under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC) Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). The definitive published version [insert complete citation information here] is available online on Westlaw UK. Available at [URL] (see: https://www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/terms/journals-access-policy.htm). | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | - |
dc.subject | bankers' duties | en_US |
dc.subject | banks | en_US |
dc.subject | Financial Conduct Authority | en_US |
dc.subject | fines | en_US |
dc.subject | money laundering | en_US |
dc.subject | big business | - |
dc.subject | banking | - |
dc.subject | bank regulation | - |
dc.subject | financial history | - |
dc.subject | corporate governance | - |
dc.title | R v Natwest (2021): Another turning point in the regulation of big banks? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.relation.isPartOf | The Company Lawyer | - |
pubs.issue | 5 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.volume | 44 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2754-2262 | - |
dc.rights.holder | Sweet and Maxwell | - |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Law School Embargoed Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Embargoed until 17 April 2024 | 335.43 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License