Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27420
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchaafsma, M-
dc.contributor.authorAhn, S-
dc.contributor.authorCastro, AJ-
dc.contributor.authorDendoncker, N-
dc.contributor.authorFilyushkina, A-
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Jiménez, D-
dc.contributor.authorHuambachano, M-
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, N-
dc.contributor.authorMwampamba, TH-
dc.contributor.authorNgouhouo-Poufoun, J-
dc.contributor.authorPalomo, I-
dc.contributor.authorPandit, R-
dc.contributor.authorTermansen, M-
dc.contributor.authorGhazi, H-
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, S-
dc.contributor.authorLee, H-
dc.contributor.authorContreras, V-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-21T12:09:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-21T12:09:54Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09-19-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Nibedita Mukherjee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2970-1498-
dc.identifier101350-
dc.identifier.citationSchaafsma, M. et al. 'Whose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justice', Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 64, 101350, pp. 1 - 12. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101350.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-3435-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27420-
dc.descriptionData Availability: All data on which this perspective is based are available in the IPBES methodological assessment on diverse values and valuation of nature.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2023 The Authors. The Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services shows that multiple valuation methods and approaches exist to assess diverse value types. The evidence is based on the largest review of academic valuation studies on nature to date, developed for the Values Assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). We evaluate studies according to environmental justice criteria. The results suggest that although diverse value types and indicators are assessed across studies, few individual studies are plural, and studies fail to provide evidence on distributive justice and score low on procedural justice indicators. We provide a set of recommendations for incorporating issues of justice in the design of valuation studies.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 12-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.titleWhose values count? A review of the nature valuation studies with a focus on justiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101350-
dc.relation.isPartOfCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume64-
dc.identifier.eissn1877-3443-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).1.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons