Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27537
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCracknell, M-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-05T18:01:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-05T18:01:38Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-01-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Matthew Cracknell https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-1173-
dc.identifier.citationCracknell, M. (2019) 'Reflections on undertaking the probation qualifying framework scheme during the transforming rehabilitation changes', Probation Journal, 63 (2), pp. 211 - 218. doi: 10.1177/0264550516648401.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-5505-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/27537-
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2016. This article reflects upon the author’s experience of undertaking the PQF (Probation Qualifying Framework) training scheme during the chaotic period of Transforming Rehabilitation. The author asserts that the uncertainty and precarious nature of the changes were detrimental to an effective learning environment, which ultimately promoted a practice culture of punitiveness and control and did not allow learners the space to be skilful and confident practitioners, comfortable working autonomously. Furthermore, the author contends there is an emerging culture within the NPS (National Probation Service) increasingly fostered on ‘risk management’, which is reflected in the vocational nature of PQF training and is contributing towards a widening cultural gap that is emerging between the community rehabilitation companies and NPS.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.format.extent211 - 218-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications on behalf of The Trade Union and Professional Association for Family Court and Probation Staffen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2016. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by SAGE Publications, Cracknell, M. (2019) 'Reflections on undertaking the probation qualifying framework scheme during the transforming rehabilitation changes', Probation Journal, 63 (2), pp. 211 - 218. doi: 10.1177/0264550516648401. (see: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use)..-
dc.rights.urihttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use-
dc.subjectcultureen_US
dc.subjectidentityen_US
dc.subjectlearning/teachingen_US
dc.subjectorganisational changeen_US
dc.subjectorganisational cultureen_US
dc.subjectpracticeen_US
dc.subjecttrainingen_US
dc.titleReflections on undertaking the probation qualifying framework scheme during the transforming rehabilitation changesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0264550516648401-
dc.relation.isPartOfProbation Journal-
pubs.issue2-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume63-
dc.identifier.eissn1741-3079-
dc.rights.holderThe Author-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2016. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by SAGE Publications, Cracknell, M. (2019) 'Reflections on undertaking the probation qualifying framework scheme during the transforming rehabilitation changes', Probation Journal, 63 (2), pp. 211 - 218. doi: 10.1177/0264550516648401. (see: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal-author-archiving-policies-and-re-use)..192.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.