Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28046
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeku, SY-
dc.contributor.authorKara, A-
dc.contributor.authorKarimov, N-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T17:37:32Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-26-
dc.date.available2024-01-18T17:37:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-04-26-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Alper Kara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8560-0501-
dc.identifier.citationDeku, S.Y., Kara, A. and Karimov, N. (2021) 'Do investors value frequent issuers in securitization?', Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 57 (4), pp. 1247 - 1282. doi: 10.1007/s11156-021-00977-2.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0924-865X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28046-
dc.descriptionJEL Classification: G21; G28.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. We assess the value of frequent issuers to investors in securitization markets by examining the initial yield spread of 6132 European mortgage-backed securities (MBS), covering a 20-year period between 1999 and 2018. We find that frequent issuers have certification value, and it increases as the credit cycle approaches its peak, as lending standards loosen, and information asymmetries in securitization markets increase. Investors value frequent issuers more favourably on riskier, difficult to evaluate MBS. We find that after the great financial crisis (GFC), investors began to attribute more value to frequent issuers, regardless of MBS credit quality. We also find that in the pre-crisis period, investors required higher yields to compensate for perceived rating shopping, which is not observed after the GFC. Finally, we show that investors expect higher yields on deals closed by subsidiaries of foreign banks.en_US
dc.format.extent1247 - 1282-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectsecuritizationen_US
dc.subjectMBS pricingen_US
dc.subjectbank-borrower distanceen_US
dc.subjectrating shoppingen_US
dc.titleDo investors value frequent issuers in securitization?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-021-00977-2-
dc.relation.isPartOfReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume57-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7179-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.767.3 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons