Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28128
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVamvakas, G-
dc.contributor.authorJarrett, M-
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, B-
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, C-
dc.contributor.authorForrester, A-
dc.contributor.authorTrebilcock, J-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, J-
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, T-
dc.contributor.authorKnodoker, M-
dc.contributor.authorMoran, P-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T17:51:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-30T17:51:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-31-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Julie Trebilcock https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-0531-
dc.identifier.citationVamvakas, G. et al. (2024) 'The effectiveness of the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway: A propensity score-matched analysis', Psychology, Crime and Law, 0 (ahead, of print), pp. 1 - 21. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2024.2310532.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1068-316X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28128-
dc.descriptionData availability statement The use of Ministry of Justice data was addressed by a time limited Data Sharing Agreement between the Ministry of Justice and Kings College London. Due to the sensitive nature of the research (high risk, high harm offending data), and due to legal restrictions, supporting data are not available.en_US
dc.descriptionSupplemental material is available online at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2310532#supplemental-material-section .-
dc.description.abstractOffenders with severe personality pathology are at significantly increased risk of serious and violent offending. In England and Wales, offenders who are likely to meet criteria for a diagnosis of personality disorder are managed within a network of ‘Offender Personality Disorder Pathway’ services. We conducted a retrospective cohort study over 6 years, using linked routine datasets, to examine the effectiveness of these services on male offenders (n = 28,321). We compared the outcomes of those who received a simple case formulation and had not been referred to Pathway services (the ‘Comparison group’), with a group of offenders who had received a complex case formulation and been referred to Pathway services (the ‘Treatment group’). Over time, significant improvements occurred in re-offending risk scores, and lower rates of behavioural disturbance among both Treatment and Comparison groups of offenders. However, no statistically significant differences were detected in the rates of improvement between Treatment and Comparison groups. Offending rates in both groups significantly increased over time, although there was no significant difference in the increase in offending rates between the Treatment and Comparison groups. Currently, there is no statistical evidence that the Pathway is associated with changes in offender behaviour.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistry of Justice & NHS England [2013/S 211-366340].en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 21-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electonic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectpersonality disorderen_US
dc.subjectoffendingen_US
dc.subjectmental healthen_US
dc.subjectcriminal behaviouren_US
dc.subjectpropensity score matchingen_US
dc.subjecttreatmenten_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway: A propensity score-matched analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2310532-
dc.relation.isPartOfPsychology, Crime and Law-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1477-2744-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.1.18 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons