Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28191
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKitayama, S-
dc.contributor.authorConstantinou, MC-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-03T16:42:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-27-
dc.date.available2024-02-03T16:42:00Z-
dc.date.issued2022-01-27-
dc.identifierORCID iD: Shoma Kitayama https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-3772-
dc.identifier.citationKitayama, S. and Constantinou, M.C. (2022) 'Performance evaluation of seismically isolated buildings near active faults', Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 51 (5), pp. 1017 - 1037. doi: 10.1002/eqe.3602.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0098-8847-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28191-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2022 The Authors. This paper investigates the collapse risk of seismically isolated buildings that are designed by the procedures of the ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard for sites within 5 km of the active fault that controls the hazard. The study is based on six-story perimeter frame buildings designed with special concentrically braced frames for a location in California. The seismic isolation systems considered in this study are comprised of either: (i) triple friction pendulum bearings with high friction coefficients at the sliding interfaces, (ii) triple friction pendulum bearings with low friction coefficient at the sliding surfaces and enhanced with fluid viscous dampers, or (iii) triple friction pendulum bearings with low friction coefficients at the sliding surfaces. The paper demonstrates that the seismically isolated buildings designed per Section 17.3.3 in ASCE/SEI 7-16 standard, but with either increased isolator displacement capacity or increased superstructure strength by comparison to the minimum required, can achieve an acceptable collapse risk. It is also demonstrated that the seismic isolation systems that have the best collapse performance for far-field motions are not necessarily the best for the near-field pulse-like ground motions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity at Buffaloen_US
dc.format.extent1017 - 1037-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectASCE/SEI 7 standarden_US
dc.subjectnear-field motionsen_US
dc.subjectperformance evaluationen_US
dc.subjectseismic isolationen_US
dc.subjecttriple friction pendulumen_US
dc.subjectviscous dampersen_US
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of seismically isolated buildings near active faultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3602-
dc.relation.isPartOfEarthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics-
pubs.issue5-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume51-
dc.identifier.eissn1096-9845-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2022 The Authors. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.1.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons