Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28192
Title: | Seismic loss assessment of seismically isolated buildings designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16 |
Authors: | Kitayama, S Cilsalar, H |
Keywords: | seismic loss assessment;seismic isolation;ASCE/SEI 7 standard;friction pendulum isolator;displacement restraint;collapse probability |
Issue Date: | 16-Nov-2021 |
Publisher: | Springer Nature |
Citation: | Kitayama, S. and Cilsalar, H. (2021) 'Seismic loss assessment of seismically isolated buildings designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16', Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20 (2), pp. 1143 - 1168. doi: 10.1007/s10518-021-01274-y. |
Abstract: | Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. This paper investigates the seismic loss assessment of seismically isolated and non-isolated buildings with steel moment or braced frames, designed by the seismic design standard of ASCE/SEI 7-16. The seismic loss is calculated from the damage to structural and non-structural components, as well as the demolition and the collapse of buildings. This study demonstrates that the expected annual losses for seismically isolated buildings are half or less than half of those calculated for non-isolated buildings. These losses depend on the types of seismic isolation systems and seismic force resisting systems used. Among the cases of isolated buildings studied in this paper, the most cost-effective systems are found to be the buildings designed by minimum strength requirement in ASCE/SEI 7-16 and with isolators which have displacement capacity 1.5 times larger than the minimum required in ASCE/SEI 7-16, in terms of expected annual losses. This study also compares the results obtained from different approaches of selection and scaling of ground motions. The following research finds that when Incremental Dynamic Analysis approach with far-field ground motion set in FEMA P695 is used, the computed expected total annual losses become doubled from the Conditional Spectra approach. |
Description: | Availability of data and material:
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Code availability: Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available in a repository or online in accordance with funder data retention policies (https://github.com/shkma/LossAssessment [last accessed 5.February.2021]). |
URI: | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28192 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01274-y |
ISSN: | 1570-761X |
Other Identifiers: | ORCID iD: Shoma Kitayama https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-3772 ORCID iD: Huseyin Cilsalar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7401-6839 |
Appears in Collections: | Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | 2.99 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License