Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28369
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFayyad, N-
dc.contributor.authorLam, B-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, R-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Y-
dc.coverage.spatialBoston, MA, USA-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T08:51:21Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-22T08:51:21Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-24-
dc.identifierORCiD: Busayawan Lam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0044-1303-
dc.identifierORCiD: Richard Evans https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0560-
dc.identifierORCiD: Youngok Choi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6099-9563-
dc.identifier.citationFayyad, N. et al. (2024) 'Workplace Wellbeing and Interior Design: A Systematic Literature Review', Proceedings of the 2024 Design Research Society Conference (DRS2024), Boston, MA, USA, 23-28 June, pp. 1 - 21. doi: 10.21606/drs.2024.901.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-912294-62-6-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28369-
dc.descriptionThis research paper is available at DRS Digital Library: https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2024/researchpapers/279/ .-
dc.description.abstractThis paper offers a systematic review of the literature on workplace wellbeing and interior design, exploring the creation and evaluation of appealing environments that enhance employee wellbeing. This paper adopts a systematic approach to review using the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Multiple databases were searched. The final review included 55 studies out of 472 that examined factors related to workplace wellbeing. The findings of this study suggest that background noise and open-plan workspaces negatively affect workplace wellbeing, while visual connections with plants and natural objects enhance it. This paper extends the current literature in two ways. Firstly, by highlighting key factors that impact workplace wellbeing. Secondly, it divides factors that contribute to workplace wellbeing into three categories: positives, negatives, and moderate impact factors. Design professionals and workplace managers can utilize this information to identify features that contribute most to the overall work environment.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 21-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDesign Research Societyen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://dl.designresearchsociety.org/conference-volumes/61/-
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.sourceProceedings of the 2024 Design Research Society Conference (DRS2024)-
dc.sourceProceedings of the 2024 Design Research Society Conference (DRS2024)-
dc.subjectworkplace wellbeingen_US
dc.subjectinterior designen_US
dc.subjectoffice designen_US
dc.subjectphysical environmenten_US
dc.titleWorkplace Wellbeing and Interior Design: A Systematic Literature Reviewen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.901-
pubs.finish-date2024-06-28-
pubs.finish-date2024-06-28-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.start-date2024-06-23-
pubs.start-date2024-06-23-
dc.identifier.eissn2398-3132-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Design School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).653 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons