Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28482
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAycan, Z-
dc.contributor.authorÖzbilgin, M-
dc.contributor.authorMoraligil, B-
dc.contributor.authorEpitropaki, O-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-06T19:01:08Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-06T19:01:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-05-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mustafa Özbilgin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-9534-
dc.identifierORCiD: Bahar Moraligil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-733X-
dc.identifierORCiD: Olga Epitropaki https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-5143-
dc.identifier.citationAycan, Z. et al. (2024) 'Reluctance to lead: Conceptualization and contextualization', European Management Journal, 42 (4), pp. 437 - 444. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2024.02.005.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0263-2373-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/28482-
dc.description.abstractRecent studies indicate a potential trend of waning enthusiasm for leadership positions. This increasing trend of avoiding leadership roles has prompted a new area of research, concentrating on agentic perspectives in leader emergence and self-selection biases. This study focuses on a key concept in this emerging field: “reluctance to lead” (RTL). Only recently has reluctance in the leadership context received limited attention from a few scholars. These efforts primarily concentrated on RTL before the role occupancy by defining it as individuals' hesitations to accept a leadership role when presented with the opportunity. This paper broadens the conceptualization of RTL by extending its definition as the hesitation of a high-potential individual both before and after role occupancy (i.e., individuals’ hesitations about their fit to the role while it is practiced). Prior studies also adopted a person-centered approach, focusing on identity- and competency-related factors while overlooking the contextual aspects in explaining RTL. This paper integrates contextual foci into the discussion of RTL, specifically exploring how spatial and technological, organizational, leadership, socio-cultural, and historical contexts (with a focus on Europe) interface with RTL. We conclude by proposing a research agenda and discussing the theoretical and practical implications of this new line of research.en_US
dc.format.extent437 - 444-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCrown Copyright / The Authors © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectreluctance to leaden_US
dc.subjectcontexten_US
dc.subjectcultureen_US
dc.titleReluctance to lead: Conceptualization and contextualizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-02-20-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2024.02.005-
dc.relation.isPartOfEuropean Management Journal-
pubs.issue4-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume42-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5681-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderCrown / The Authors-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCrown Copyright / The Authors © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. under a Creative Commons license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).523.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons