Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29121
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHadid, W-
dc.contributor.authorHorii, S-
dc.contributor.authorYokota, A-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-05T06:30:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-05T06:30:12Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-28-
dc.identifierORCiD: Wael Hadid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6055-3748-
dc.identifier.citationHadid, W., Horii, S. and Yokota, A. (2024) 'Artificial intelligent technologies in Japanese manufacturing firms: An empirical survey study', International Journal of Production Research, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 27. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2024.2358409.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0020-7543-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29121-
dc.descriptionData availability statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [WH], upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractMotivated by conflicting arguments/claims in the AI literature on its implementation, motivations, and practical impact, we combine interview data from a case company with questionnaire data from eighty-five Japanese manufacturing firms to examine seven AI technologies at firm, function, and technology levels. We find that one-third of the sample firms did not employ any of the seven AI technologies. Over 50% of the remaining firms implemented one or two technologies only. Visual recognition, machine learning and natural written language processing were the most commonly implemented technologies. AI implementation was the highest in production and research and development compared to other functions. The main motivations for implementing AI were to enhance operational efficiency, improve defects detection and prediction, automate processes, and reduce labour hours/costs. Among the firms that implemented AI, improvements in operational efficiency were more frequently reported, followed by reductions in labour hours/costs and enhancements in product/process quality. Lack of business needs, suitability to the business, expertise in implementation, and confidence in generating significant benefits were the main reasons for not experimenting with AI technologies. Our detailed analysis improves our understanding of the current state of AI adoption in manufacturing firms, its practical impact and highlights avenues for future research.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 27-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Production Research on 28 Jun 2024, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00207543.2024.2358409 (see: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/). It is made available on this institutional repository under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectartificial intelligence technologiesen_US
dc.subjectcase studyen_US
dc.subjectsurveyen_US
dc.subjectmanufacturing industriesen_US
dc.subjectJapanen_US
dc.subjectSDG 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructureen_US
dc.titleArtificial intelligent technologies in Japanese manufacturing firms: An empirical survey studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-05-14-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2358409-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Production Research-
pubs.issue00-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1366-588X-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderTaylor & Francis-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Business School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed for 12 months after publication703.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons