Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29301
Title: A Modified Loss Breakdown Approach for Axial Turbines Operating With Blended Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
Authors: Abdeldayem, AS
Salah, SI
White, MT
Sayma, AI
Keywords: axial turbine;CFD;loss audit;aerodynamic;losses;sCO2 blends
Issue Date: 11-Jul-2023
Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Citation: Abdeldayem, A.S. et al. (2023) 'A Modified Loss Breakdown Approach for Axial Turbines Operating With Blended Supercritical Carbon Dioxide', Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 145 (8), 081002, pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.1115/1.4062478.
Abstract: In this paper, a modified loss breakdown approach is introduced for axial turbines operating with supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) mixtures using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results. Loss breakdown analysis has been previously developed using two approaches, however each approach has its own uncertainties. The first approach neglects the effects of the cross-interaction between the different loss sources, while the second approach ignores the potential changes to the boundary layer thicknesses and the loss source domains. Although the second methodology accounts for the interactions between the different loss sources, it may produce less accurate predictions for compact machines like sCO2 turbines where the boundary layer may dominate the flow passage. The proposed methodology aims to obtain the turbine loss breakdown using a single CFD model where all sources of aerodynamic loss coexist, while considering variable loss regions defined based on the velocity and entropy distribution results. A steady-state, single-stage, single-passage, three-dimensional numerical model is setup to simulate the turbine and verify the loss audit methodology. The results are verified against the published loss audit methodologies for a 130 MW axial turbine operating with CO2/C6F6 blend, designed using an in-house mean line design code. The results show a good agreement between the proposed approach and the multiple-model approaches from the literature. However, the existing approaches appear to overestimate endwall losses by 13–16% and underestimate the profile losses by 11–31% compared to the proposed approach. Compared to the Aungier mean line loss model, large differences in loss sources are observed from the CFD results, especially for the stator and rotor endwall losses which are found to be 3.2 and 1.6 times the CFD values, respectively. This helps to indicate limitations in existing mean line loss models.
Description: Paper No: GTP-22-1616
URI: https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29301
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062478
ISSN: 0742-4795
Other Identifiers: ORCiD:Abdulnaser I. Sayma https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2315-0004
081002
GTP-22-1616
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2023 by ASME / The Authors; reuse license CC-BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).3.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons