Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29349
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWebb, C-
dc.contributor.authorAnguilano, L-
dc.contributor.authorTroisi, G-
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt Rivera, X-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-13T20:50:02Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-13T20:50:02Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-16-
dc.identifierORCiD: Lorna Anguilano https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-4157-
dc.identifierORCiD: Gera Troisi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0889-9834-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ximena Schmidt Rivera https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0157-2679-
dc.identifier142903-
dc.identifier.citationWebb, C. et al. (2024) 'Life cycle environmental evaluation of medical oxygen masks in the UK', Journal of Cleaner Production, 467, 142903 , pp. 1 - 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142903.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29349-
dc.descriptionData availability: All data used in this article has been described in the inventory section and in additional SI.en_US
dc.descriptionSupplementary data are available online at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624023527#appsec1 .-
dc.description.abstractIn a clinical setting, medical oxygen masks (MOMs) are made using lightweight and transparent materials with Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) being a popular choice. Environmental concerns around the use of PVC have arisen due to the toxicity of plasticisers required; in particular the use of increasingly regulated phthalate (Pht) based plasticisers. Non-Pht plasticisers and alternative materials to PVC are being sought as potential replacements in order to keep MOMs in line with current and expected regulations. This study explores the environmental impacts of three (low-flow) MOMs using a life cycle assessment approach from cradle to grave with a functional unit defined as ‘one single-use low-flow medical oxygen mask for adult use in the UK’. The results account for all 11 impact categories as provided by the CML-IA baseline v3.03 methodology. PVC is the main component of two MOMs: mask A using a non-Pht based plasticiser and mask C (a hypothetical mask) using Pht-based plasticiser DEHP. For Mask B, styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene based thermoplastic elastomer (TPE-S) and polypropylene is used instead of PVC. Mask B shows the lowest environmental impact across all impact categories. For six out of 11 impact categories (including global warming potential and ozone depletion), mask C scores highest, whereas mask A is highest for the other five categories (with large impacts in human toxicity and ecotoxicities). Two scenario analyses show the importance of supply chain logistics (i.e., the location of the manufacturing site and location of end user) on overall environmental impact. The results of this study intend to provide evidence to policy makers, healthcare professionals, and manufacturers of MOMs to improve the overall environmental impacts of these products, as they contribute around 4437 tonnes of CO2 eq. yearly in the UK alone. The results show that switching from plasticised PVC to TPE-S would reduce the impacts of the use of MOMS within the UK by 2755 tonnes of CO2 eq. per year.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was undertaken whilst receiving a studentship, however, the funding source had no involvement in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, or any of the writing stage.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 16-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectplasticisersen_US
dc.subjectLCAen_US
dc.subjectmedical devicesen_US
dc.subjectphthalatesen_US
dc.subjectsustainable polymersen_US
dc.titleLife cycle environmental evaluation of medical oxygen masks in the UKen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-06-12-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142903-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Cleaner Production-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume467-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-1786-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:The Experimental Techniques Centre
Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers
Dept of Chemical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).6.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons