Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29441
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKubačka, J-
dc.contributor.authorKarayiannis, T-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-28T06:45:54Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-28T06:45:54Z-
dc.date.issued2024-09-06-
dc.identifierORCiD: Ján Kubačka https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-7031-
dc.identifierORCiD: Tassos Karayiannis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-960X-
dc.identifier.citationKubačka, J. and Karayiannis, T. (2024) 'Performance of vacuum-insulated central pipes for deep borehole heat exchangers in geothermal systems', International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 19 , pp. 2068 - 2085. doi: 10.1093/ijlct/ctae132.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-1317-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29441-
dc.description.abstractGeothermal energy is considered a promising future energy prospect, with the geothermal well outlet temperature being one of the important parameters affecting possible utilization options. For ground source heat pump applications or direct district heating, using lower temperatures can be acceptable. However, efficient electricity production requires a higher enthalpy gradient, which cannot be achieved without high temperature at the wellhead. The selection of the dry co-axial close-loop deep borehole systems (DBHE) may be, in some cases, very beneficial. The operating performance of co-axial DBHE can be optimized if the undesired heat transfer between the central pipe and annular fluid zones is minimized. Therefore, the operational performance of such a system depends strongly on the high thermal resistance of the central pipe. The most common option would be a low thermal conductivity material, such as high-density polyethylene (HDPE). In addition, vacuum-insulated tubing (VIT) used as the central pipe could be considered. The article presents results from the study aimed at the comparison of the homogeneous central pipe made of HDPE material and the gap-insulated central pipe. In the study, various air pressure levels as well as variations of surface emissivity were examined to reveal the effect on the heat transfer between the fluid channels. The simulation has been performed using a new purposely developed WellTH simulation software. A coaxial heat exchanger system using a VIT outperforms significantly the heat exchanger with an HDPE for deep geothermal wells. However, this advantage diminishes for shallow wells and therefore this tendency should be considered in the design stage.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNone declared.en_US
dc.format.extent2068 - 2085-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectgeothermal energyen_US
dc.subjectco-axial heat exchangeren_US
dc.subjectclosed-loop systemen_US
dc.subjectvacuum-insulated central pipeen_US
dc.titlePerformance of vacuum-insulated central pipes for deep borehole heat exchangers in geothermal systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctae132-
dc.relation.isPartOfInternational Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume19-
dc.identifier.eissn1748-1325-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.1.95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons