Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29491
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Y-
dc.contributor.authorHowarth, A-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-03T17:22:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-03T17:22:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-11-
dc.identifierORCiD: Yasmin Ibrahim https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2510-6683-
dc.identifierORCiD: Anita Howarth https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0102-6096-
dc.identifier.citationIbrahim, Y. and Howarth, A. (2021) 'The Munchetty Controversy: Empire, Race and the BBC', Gender, Work and Organization, 28 (1), pp. 231 - 247. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12543.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0968-6673-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29491-
dc.description.abstractIn September 2019, Naga Munchetty, a BBC presenter, was charged by the corporation as having breached its guidelines in sharing her personal experience of racism in reaction to Donald Trump's “Go Back” outburst at four female political opponents, an incident understood worldwide as a racist attack. The BBC, acting on complaints from some viewers, upheld that Munchetty had partially breached its journalistic guidelines in speaking about her experience of racism. This article, through a postcolonial critique of the incident, argues that the BBC guidelines and the censure of Munchetty have to be viewed through an organizational “dual consciousness” of the libidinal economy of the BBC as part of the British Empire and being an active broker of race relations in Britain through the national broadcasting space as a public service broadcaster. The BBC, both as an organization and a broadcaster, is inscribed through its historicity and a long trajectory of “fixing” the identity of the racial “Other.” In the Munchetty controversy, her racial subjectivity is made “uncanny” or alien to the racialized subject through the BBC's organizational ethos of “objectivity and impartiality” to reassemble race as fiction within its “regime of representation.”en_US
dc.format.extent231 - 247-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Gender, Work & Organization published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectBBCen_US
dc.subjectempireen_US
dc.subjectobjectivity and impartialityen_US
dc.subjectpublic service broadcasteren_US
dc.subjectraceen_US
dc.subjectracialized subjecten_US
dc.titleThe Munchetty Controversy: Empire, Race and the BBCen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2020-09-04-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12543-
dc.relation.isPartOfGender, Work and Organization-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume28-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0432-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Social and Political Sciences Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2020 The Authors. Gender, Work & Organization published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.287.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons