Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29589
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | McMeeking, KP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peasnell, KV | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pope, PF | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-22T08:11:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-22T08:11:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006-07-01 | - |
dc.identifier | ORCiD: Kevin P. McMeeking https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-0571 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | McMeeking, K.P., Peasnell, K.V. and Pope, P.F. (2006) 'The determinants of the UK Big Firm premium', Accounting and Business Research, 36 (3), pp. 207 - 231. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730022. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0001-4788 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29589 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Our study attempts to determine whether, and if so why, the large auditing firms are able to earn a premium on their audit work in the UK. We start by confirming the apparent existence of a Big Firm premium during the period 1985-2002. We examine industry specialisation, non-audit service fee and monopoly pricing explanations for the premium. The results of our tests of industry specialisation are mixed. There is little evidence that this premium is associated with industry specialisation when specialists are defined at the national level. Significant premia are observed if specialisation is defined at the city level, particularly if the auditor is the industry leader. However, when appropriate allowance is made for endogeneity, by modelling both audit and non-audit fees in a simultaneous equations framework, the Big Firm premium disappears. We find evidence to suggest that non-audit fees earned by auditors from their audit clients are positively related to the size of the audit fee and vice versa. Finally, when the sample is stratified by the size of audit client, we find no systematic evidence of anti-competitive pricing. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 207 - 231 | - |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) | en_US |
dc.rights | Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Accounting and Business Research, on 1 July 2006, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730022 . This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).(see: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/). | - |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | - |
dc.title | The determinants of the UK Big Firm premium | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.date.dateAccepted | 2006-04-01 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730022 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Accounting and Business Research | - |
pubs.issue | 3 | - |
pubs.publication-status | Published | - |
pubs.volume | 36 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2159-4260 | - |
dc.rights.license | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en | - |
dc.rights.holder | Taylor & Francis | - |
Appears in Collections: | Brunel Business School Research Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FullText.pdf | Copyright © 2006 Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Accounting and Business Research, on 1 July 2006, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730022 . This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).(see: https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/). | 294.71 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License