Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29640
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAjovalasit, M-
dc.contributor.authorMoorhouse, G-
dc.contributor.authorGiacomin, J-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-01T19:01:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-01T19:01:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-01-
dc.identifierORCiD: Marco Ajovalasit https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8818-2683-
dc.identifierORCiD: Joseph Giacomin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-904X-
dc.identifier.citationAjovalasit, M., Moorhouse, G. and Giacomin, J. (2024) 'A vocabulary of meaning of designed commercial artefacts based on naturally occurring language use', Journal of Design, Business and Society, 10 (1), pp. 9 - 42. doi: 10.1386/dbs_00057_1.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2055-2106-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29640-
dc.description.abstractThis study is a survey of the English-language words that are used when speaking about meaning with specific focus on the categories of function, ritual and myth. Such words can be used in interviews, questionnaires, measurement metrics and other forms of ethnography and testing. Understanding why consumers perceive designed artefacts to be personally relevant is a commercial imperative. Previous research has suggested that three categories of meaning are commonly encountered, i.e. function, ritual and myth. They cover a spectrum from the purely instrumental to the purely symbolic. However, despite the logical and philosophical groundwork, there has been little analysis of the actual words and phrases that are in everyday use by people when describing the meanings of designed artefacts. The objectives of the study described here were (1) to identify the words and phrases that are most frequently encountered in everyday language when discussing meaning, (2) to determine for each word or phrase its degree of belonging to the formal categories of function, ritual and myth and (3) to thematically group the words and phrases into macro-components of meaning. Three different analysis were performed. The first was based on the contents of major online dictionaries and thesauri, the second was based on the results from queries of the online lexical database WordNet and the third was based on a corpus analysis approach involving neural network word embedding algorithms. Thematic grouping of the database of extracted words and phrases suggested that in all three cases the macro-components of the concept of ‘function’, ‘ritual’ and ‘myth’ cover a spectrum that can be considered to be from an essential property (‘intention’, ‘ceremonial’ and ‘belief’) to an emergent property (‘action’, ‘spiritual’ and ‘symbolism’). The list of words, phrases and macro-components provides a first empirically established vocabulary of meaning for use in design activity.en_US
dc.format.extent9 - 42-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIntellecten_US
dc.rightsCopyright © Marco Ajovalasit, Gustav Moorhouse and Joseph Giacomin, 2024. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Journal of Design, Business and Society, 10 (01), pp. 9 - 42, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00057_1. Authors may deposit their accepted manuscript in a non-commercial, institutional or subject repository upon publication, but access to this must be restricted until the end of the embargo period (12 months after the final version has been published and distributed). Any exceptions must be agreed in writing with Intellect. The author is not permitted to post, print, or otherwise distribute the journal’s version of record/final published version at any time without permission. (see: https://www.intellectbooks.com/licence-and-usage-policy).-
dc.rights.urihttps://www.intellectbooks.com/licence-and-usage-policy-
dc.subjectwordsen_US
dc.subjectfunctionen_US
dc.subjectritualen_US
dc.subjectmythen_US
dc.subjectmeaningen_US
dc.subjecthuman centred designen_US
dc.titleA vocabulary of meaning of designed commercial artefacts based on naturally occurring language useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-02-29-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00057_1-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Design, Business and Society-
pubs.issue1-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume10-
dc.identifier.eissn2055-2106-
dc.rights.holderMarco Ajovalasit, Gustav Moorhouse and Joseph Giacomin-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Design School Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 1 April 2025. Copyright © Marco Ajovalasit, Gustav Moorhouse and Joseph Giacomin, 2024. The definitive, peer reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Journal of Design, Business and Society, 10 (01), pp. 9 - 42, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs_00057_1. Authors may deposit their accepted manuscript in a non-commercial, institutional or subject repository upon publication, but access to this must be restricted until the end of the embargo period (12 months after the final version has been published and distributed). Any exceptions must be agreed in writing with Intellect. The author is not permitted to post, print, or otherwise distribute the journal’s version of record/final published version at any time without permission. (see: https://www.intellectbooks.com/licence-and-usage-policy).2.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.