Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29733
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMahini, R-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, G-
dc.contributor.authorParviainen, T-
dc.contributor.authorDüsing, R-
dc.contributor.authorNandi, AK-
dc.contributor.authorCong, F-
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, T-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-13T17:47:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-13T17:47:37Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-20-
dc.identifierORCiD: Asoke K. Nandi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-2875-
dc.identifier.citationMahini, R. et al. (2024) 'Brain Evoked Response Qualification Using Multi-Set Consensus Clustering: Toward Single-Trial EEG Analysis', Brain Topography, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 23. doi: 10.1007/s10548-024-01074-y.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0896-0267-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29733-
dc.descriptionData availability: This study does not include data collection from individual participants, and public data has been used.en_US
dc.descriptionElectronic Supplementary Material: Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary Material 1: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10548-024-01074-y/MediaObjects/10548_2024_1074_MOESM1_ESM.docx .-
dc.description.abstractIn event-related potential (ERP) analysis, it is commonly assumed that individual trials from a subject share similar properties and originate from comparable neural sources, allowing reliable interpretation of group-averages. Nevertheless, traditional group-level ERP analysis methods, including cluster analysis, often overlook critical information about individual subjects’ neural processes due to using fixed measurement intervals derived from averaging. We developed a multi-set consensus clustering pipeline to examine cognitive processes at the individual subject level. Initially, consensus clustering from diverse methods was applied to single-trial EEG epochs of individual subjects. Subsequently, a second level of consensus clustering was performed across the trials of each subject. A newly modified time window determination method was then employed to identify individual subjects’ ERP(s) of interest. We validated our method with simulated data for ERP components N2 and P3, and real data from a visual oddball task to confirm the P3 component. Our findings revealed that estimated time windows for individual subjects provide precise ERP identification compared to fixed time windows across all subjects. Additionally, Monte Carlo simulations with synthetic single-trial data demonstrated stable scores for the N2 and P3 components, confirming the reliability of our method. The proposed method enhances the examination of brain-evoked responses at the individual subject level by considering single-trial EEG data, thereby extracting mutual information relevant to the neural process. This approach offers a significant improvement over conventional ERP analysis, which relies on the averaging mechanism and fixed measurement interval.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no funding for this study. Open Access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 23-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectsingle-trial EEGen_US
dc.subjecttime windowen_US
dc.subjectmulti-set consensus clusteringen_US
dc.subjectstandardizationen_US
dc.subjectEEG/ERP microstatesen_US
dc.subjectcognitive processen_US
dc.titleBrain Evoked Response Qualification Using Multi-Set Consensus Clustering: Toward Single-Trial EEG Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-07-22-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-024-01074-y-
dc.relation.isPartOfBrain Topography-
pubs.issueahead of print-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-6792-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author(s) 2024. Rights and permissions: Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.5.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons