Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29951
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, A-
dc.contributor.authorFan, M-
dc.contributor.authorBertolesi, E-
dc.contributor.authorChen, H-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Z-
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, T-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T07:24:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-17T07:24:56Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-14-
dc.identifierORCiD: Mizi Fan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6609-3110-
dc.identifierORCiD: Elisa Bertolesi https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3258-0743-
dc.identifierORCiD: Terry Roberts https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6738-2176-
dc.identifier113249-
dc.identifier.citationMohamed, A. et al. (2024) 'Microbial loading and self-healing in cementitious materials: A review of immobilisation techniques and materials', Materials and Design, 249, 113249, pp. 1 - 14. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113249.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-1275-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/29951-
dc.descriptionData availability: Data will be made available on request.en_US
dc.description.abstractConcrete has been a material of choice when it comes to building materials for decades. However, concrete has a number of challenges in which a major challenge being microcracking leading to excess damage and wastes. The development and advancement of self-healing technology throughout the past decade have seen the popular use of immobilization as a way of protecting bacteria from the harsh environments found in cementitious materials. This paper reviews the materials used for immobilization, categorising into organic materials and inorganic materials, and investigates the various immobilization techniques used to immobilize bacteria into polymeric structures and porous materials. The study evaluates the key findings in literature surrounding immobilization materials and methods as well as highlighting possible alternative sustainable materials and methods including waste/by-product resources. It was found that inorganic materials were superior to organic material in terms of self-healing and mechanical properties, with nanomaterials producing the highest crack closure of 1.20 mm. Various immobilization techniques efficiency was tested comparing microencapsulation, vacuum impregnation and adsorption methods. Further studies are needed to understand the relationship between carrier materials and cementitious matrix and explore the possible use of nanomaterials as a way of uniformly distributing bacteria in cementitious matrix.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 14-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectself-healingen_US
dc.subjectmicrobial immobilizationen_US
dc.subjectorganic and inorganic materialsen_US
dc.subjectconcreteen_US
dc.subjectcracksen_US
dc.titleMicrobial loading and self-healing in cementitious materials: A review of immobilisation techniques and materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2024-08-13-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113249-
dc.relation.isPartOfMaterials and Design-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume249-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4197-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en-
dc.rights.holderThe Authors-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).5.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons