Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30153
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRahman, S-
dc.contributor.authorAghayeva, S-
dc.coverage.spatialNottingham, UK-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-17T12:43:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-17T12:43:57Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-19-
dc.identifierORCiD: Sheehan Rahman https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0805-7311-
dc.identifier.citationRahman, S. and Aghayeva, S. (2023) 'Has the Accounting Directive Benefited Britain?', Proceedings of the Joint Annual Conference of the British Accounting and Finance Association (BAFA) Corporate Finance and Asset Pricing SIG and the Northern Area Group 2023, Nottingham, UK, 19-20 January, pp. 1 - 50.,en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30153-
dc.descriptionData Availability: All data used in this paper have been obtained from publicly available sources identified in the paper. Data used in this study will be provided upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study contributes to examining the efficacy of the EU Accounting Directive (AD) in achieving its regulatory goals in the UK capital market. The main purpose of the AD was to simplify accounting requirements to lower firms’ administrative burdens, with a focus on lowering the business costs of small firms. Using a sample of UK firms, we find that while reported business costs decrease post AD adoption, small firms do not exhibit lower costs during this period. Upon AD adoption, the UK Government also argued that implementing AD provisions must not undermine firms’ accounting quality. Contrary to this expectation, we find that the post AD adoption period coincides with a period of lower earnings persistence, lower conservatism, increased smoothing and lower value relevance for UK firms. There also appears to be a shift from accruals management towards real activities manipulation during this time. The decline in accounting quality is exhibited in both small and non-small firms. This is the first study to examine the relationship between AD adoption and firms’ business costs and accounting quality. Overall, the evidence in our paper should assist UK policy makers in assessing the utility of the AD for UK.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 50-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBritish Accounting and Finance Associationen_US
dc.sourceJoint Annual Conference of the British Accounting and Finance Association (BAFA) Corporate Finance and Asset Pricing SIG and the Northern Area Group 2023-
dc.sourceJoint Annual Conference of the British Accounting and Finance Association (BAFA) Corporate Finance and Asset Pricing SIG and the Northern Area Group 2023-
dc.subjectaccounting directiveen_US
dc.subjectaccounting qualityen_US
dc.subjectearnings persistenceen_US
dc.subjectconservatismen_US
dc.subjectreal activities manipulationen_US
dc.subjectbusiness costsen_US
dc.titleHas the Accounting Directive Benefited Britain?en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.date.dateAccepted2022-11-04-
pubs.finish-date2023-01-20-
pubs.finish-date2023-01-20-
pubs.publication-statusUnpublished-
pubs.start-date2023-01-19-
pubs.start-date2023-01-19-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdf516.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.