Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30478
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVassilopoulou, J-
dc.contributor.advisorOzbilgin, M-
dc.contributor.authorScott, Daina-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T15:24:18Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-15T15:24:18Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30478-
dc.descriptionThis thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University Londonen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the experiences of Black academics working in academia in the United Kingdom (UK), drawing on Bourdieu's theory of practice and insights from Critical Race Theory (CRT). It adopts a multilevel analysis of the experience of Black academics in the UK academic settings. The study expands Bourdieu's theory of linguistic capital by illustrating how accents, typically a disadvantage for migrants, can serve as an advantage for Black academics in the UK. At the meso level, group interactions are examined using Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic violence, focusing on how privilege is perceived and perpetuated through linguistic violence. At the micro level, the concepts of agency and symbolic violence are applied to analyse the dynamics and interactions among Black academics. Meanwhile, at the macro level, structural and institutional trends are explored through Bourdieu’s theory of fields. Critical Race Theory (CRT) addresses and analyses racial and structural barriers. This thesis makes an original contribution by extending the theoretical understanding of the root causes, mechanisms, and struggles surrounding Black underrepresentation in UK academia. Through twenty-six interviews with Black UK academics, the research highlights the enduring impact of structural racism and systemic barriers while also addressing the role of fragmented networks and subtle forms of symbolic violence within academic institutions. Migratory differences in attitudes toward geographic mobility, particularly migration from the UK to US academia, further illuminate how Black scholars navigate these barriers. Participants' narratives underscore the impact of structural injustices, including fragmented networks, and the subtle yet pervasive nature of symbolic violence within academic and institutional settings in the UK. The findings underscore the importance of transformative, systemic change to dismantle institutional biases and foster inclusive academic environments that empower Black scholars. By intertwining Bourdieu’s theoretical framework with CRT, this study advances both fields, offering a nuanced understanding of race, academia, and social justice.en_US
dc.publisherBrunel University Londonen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30478/1/FulltextThesis.pdf-
dc.subjectunderrepresentation in academiaen_US
dc.subjectsystemic barriers in higher educationen_US
dc.subjectracial inequality in career advancementen_US
dc.subjectblack scholars and leadershipen_US
dc.subjectintersection of race and social capitalen_US
dc.titleExploring the complexities of black academic life in the UK using Bourdieu’s theory and critical race theoryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Appears in Collections:Business and Management
Brunel Business School Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FulltextThesis.pdfEmbargoed until 16/12/20271.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.