Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30566
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPahontu, RL-
dc.contributor.authorPoupakis, S-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T15:50:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-24T15:50:25Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-12-
dc.identifier.citationPahontu, R.L. and Poupakis, S. (2024) 'Resemblance and Discrimination in Elections', The Journal of Politics, 0 (ahead of print), pp. 1 - 24. doi: 10.1086/734268.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3816-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30566-
dc.descriptionData Availability: Replication files are available in the JOP Dataverse (https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/jop). The empirical analysis has been successfully replicated by the JOP replication analyst. Supplementary material is available in the online edition.en_US
dc.description.abstractDiscrimination affects hiring, mating and voting decisions. Whilst discrimination in elections mainly relates to gender or race, we introduce a novel source of discrimination: candidate resemblance. When candidates’ partisanship is not known, voters select those that resemble most elected co-partisans. Using a machine learning algorithm for face comparison among white male legislators, we find a stronger resemblance effect for Republicans compared to Democrats in the US. This happens because Republicans have a higher within-party facial resemblance than Democrats, even when accounting for gender and race. We find a similar pattern in the UK, where Conservative MPs are more similar looking to each other than Labour. Using a survey experiment, we find that Tory voters reward resemblance, while there is no similar effect for Labour. The results are consistent with an interpretation of this behaviour as a form of statistical discrimination.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRaluca L Pahontu acknowledges financial support from the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford, and London School of Economics and Political Science.en_US
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Press on behalf of Southern Political Science Associationen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/jop-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/-
dc.subjectvoter behaviouren_US
dc.subjectdiscrimiinationen_US
dc.subjectfacial resemblanceen_US
dc.subjectlow-information electionen_US
dc.subjectparisanshipen_US
dc.titleResemblance and Discrimination in Electionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1086/734268-
dc.relation.isPartOfThe Journal of Politics-
pubs.issue00-
pubs.publication-statusPublished online-
pubs.volume0-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2508-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.en-
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-11-27-
dc.rights.holderSouthern Political Science Association-
Appears in Collections:Dept of Economics and Finance Embargoed Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfEmbargoed until 27 November 2025. Copyright © 2024 Southern Political Science Association. Published by University of Chicago Press for the Southern Political Science Association. https://doi.org/10.1086/734268. Accepted for publication by The Journal of Politics on November 27 2024. Made available on this institutional repository under a under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license after an embargo period of 12 months,. All Rights reserved. See: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cont/jrnl_rights4.64 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons