Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30764
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSolomon, S-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-19T16:16:56Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-19T16:16:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010-07-30-
dc.identifierORCiD: Solon Solomon https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8664-7459-
dc.identifier.citationSolomon, S. (2010) 'The Great Oxymoron: Jus in Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures Towards Gaza as a Case Study', Chinese Journal of International Law, 9 (3), pp. 501 - 536. doi: 10.1093/chinesejil/jmq020.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-1650-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/30764-
dc.description.abstractModern warfare and the war on terror against mainly non-State actors have obliged States to resort to innovative measures which blur the limits between jus in bello and jus ad bellum and create a legal oxymoron where the same measures constitute international law violations should they be perceived under jus in bello and legitimate means of self-defense should they be seen under the lens of self-defense and jus ad bellum. In order to demonstrate the particular axiom the note will use the Israeli–Palestinian conflict as a factual and normative framework and will put under its kaleidoscope the post-disengagement Israeli measures towards Gaza.en_US
dc.format.extent501 - 536-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Chinese Journal of International Law, following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Solomon, S. (2010) 'The Great Oxymoron: Jus in Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures Towards Gaza as a Case Study', Chinese Journal of International Law, 9 (3), pp. 501 - 536, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmq020 (see: https://global.oup.com/academic/rights/permissions/autperm/?cc=gb&lang=en&).Copyright © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Chinese Journal of International Law, following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Solomon, S. (2010) 'The Great Oxymoron: Jus in Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures Towards Gaza as a Case Study', Chinese Journal of International Law, 9 (3), pp. 501 - 536, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmq020 (see: https://global.oup.com/academic/rights/permissions/autperm/?cc=gb&lang=en&).-
dc.rights.urihttps://global.oup.com/academic/rights/permissions/autperm/?cc=gb&lang=en&-
dc.titleThe Great Oxymoron: Jus in Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures Towards Gaza as a Case Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmq020-
dc.relation.isPartOfChinese Journal of International Law-
pubs.issue3-
pubs.publication-statusPublished-
pubs.volume9-
dc.identifier.eissn1746-9937-
dc.rights.holderThe Author-
dc.contributor.orcidSolomon, Solon [0000-0002-8664-7459]-
Appears in Collections:Brunel Law School Research Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FullText.pdfCopyright © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Chinese Journal of International Law, following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Solomon, S. (2010) 'The Great Oxymoron: Jus in Bello Violations as Legitimate Non-Forcible Measures of Self-Defense: The Post-Disengagement Israeli Measures Towards Gaza as a Case Study', Chinese Journal of International Law, 9 (3), pp. 501 - 536, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmq020 (see: https://global.oup.com/academic/rights/permissions/autperm/?cc=gb&lang=en&).264.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in BURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.